Education, Culture, and Digital Futures: Building Inclusive Learning Systems in Nigeria and Beyond
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/a7yar444Keywords:
Nigeria Cultural Studies, Educational Innovation, Teaching Methodologies, Indigenous Knowledge, Digital Education, Postcolonial Education, Curriculum DevelopmentAbstract
This comprehensive study examines the intricate relationship between Nigeria's rich cultural heritage and its evolving landscape of educational theory and teaching innovation. Drawing on multidisciplinary research and empirical data, we explore how traditional cultural practices and knowledge systems can inform and enhance contemporary pedagogical approaches. The article analyzes the current state of cultural studies in Nigerian education, identifying both the challenges posed by historical colonial legacies and the opportunities presented by emerging digital technologies. Through detailed case studies and empirical findings, we demonstrate how culturally responsive teaching methods significantly improve student engagement, critical thinking, and educational outcomes across diverse Nigerian contexts. The research reveals that educational innovations rooted in indigenous knowledge systems while embracing technological advancements can foster more inclusive, effective, and sustainable learning environments. We propose a theoretical framework for integrating cultural content with pedagogical practices that aligns with global educational standards while honoring local traditions. The findings offer valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to develop more contextually appropriate and transformative educational experiences in Nigeria and other postcolonial contexts.
References
[1]Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
[2]Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an effective literature review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 39(2), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009
[3]Luft, J. A., Bangert, A., & Dahl, T. L. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An overview for early‐career researchers. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 21(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134
[4]Shah, N., Gupta, P. & Singh, T. Reflection: A Tool for Learning and Assessment in Competency-Based Curriculum. Indian Pediatr 61, 771–777 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-024-3259-0
[5]Govender, N., Mudzamiri, E. Incorporating indigenous artefacts in developing an integrated indigenous-pedagogical model in high school physics curriculum: views of elders, teachers and learners. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 17, 827–850 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10076-2
[6]Epizitone A, Moyane SP, Agbehadji IE. A Systematic Literature Review of Health Information Systems for Healthcare. Healthcare. 2023; 11(7):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11070959
[7]Juárez SP, Honkaniemi H. Guidelines for the Use of Literature Reviews in Master’s Theses in Public Health. Pedagogy in Health Promotion. 2024;11(2):110-119. doi:10.1177/23733799241275612
[8]Snyder, H. (2023). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197704
[9]Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
[10]Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
[11]Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
[12]Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
[13]Zidny, R., Sjöström, J. & Eilks, I. A Multi-Perspective Reflection on How Indigenous Knowledge and Related Ideas Can Improve Science Education for Sustainability. Sci & Educ 29, 145–185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
[14]Nnama-Okechukwu, C. U., & McLaughlin, H. (2022). Indigenous knowledge and social work education in Nigeria: made in Nigeria or made in the West? Social Work Education, 42(8), 1476–1493. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.2038557
[15]Okebukola, P. A., Owolabi, O., & Okebukola, F. O. (2013). Mother-tongue as default language of instruction in lower primary science classes: Tension between policy prescription and practice in Nigeria. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21070
[16]Salami, L. O. (2008). It is Still “Double Take”: Mother Tongue Education and Bilingual Classroom Practice in Nigeria. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 7(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348450701542223
[17]Dei, G. J. S. (2000). Rethinking the role of indigenous knowledges in the academy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/136031100284849
[18]Ogunniyi, M. B. (2007). Teachers’ Stances and Practical Arguments Regarding a Science‐Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum: Part 1. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 963–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600931020
[19]Nzewi, M. (1999). Strategies for music education in Africa: Towards a meaningful progression from tradition to modern. International Journal of Music Education, os-33(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/025576149903300109
[20]Eglash, R., Lachney, M., Babbitt, W. et al. Decolonizing education with Anishinaabe arcs: generative STEM as a path to indigenous futurity. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 1569–1593 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09728-6
[21]Matindike, F., & Ramdhany, V. (2024). Incorporating indigenous knowledge perspectives in integrated STEM education: a systematic review. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(3), 1022–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2413675
[22]Jin Q. Supporting Indigenous Students in Science and STEM Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences. 2021; 11(9):555. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090555
[23]Huang, L., Liang, M., Xiong, Y., Wu, X., & Lim, C. P. (2024). A systematic review of technology-enabled teacher professional development during COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Education, 223, Article 105-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105168
[24]Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., Brugha, M., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
[25]Masoumi, D., & Noroozi, O. (2023). Developing early career teachers’ professional digital competence: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 644–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2229006
[26]Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547-588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
[27]De Mars, A., J. Taken Alive, M. Ortiz, Z. Ma, and W. Wang. 2022. “Educators’ Perspectives on Factors Impacting STEM Achievement in Rural Indigenous Student-Serving Schools.” The Rural Educator 43 (1): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v43i1.1207.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fatim Ibrahim Turashkati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
